home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- ORDER LIST
-
- FRIDAY, AUGUST 11, 1995
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
-
-
- D-1333 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF STEPHEN ALAN SHARP
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Stephen
-
- Alan Sharp, of Washington, D.C., has been disbarred from
-
- the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Virginia and
-
- this Court by order of November 29, 1993, having
-
- suspended the said Stephen Alan Sharp from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Stephen Alan Sharp be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1365IN THE MATTER OF NICHOLAS ANGELO MICELLI
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Nicholas
-
- Angelo Micelli of Los Angeles, California, has died,
-
- the Rule to Show Cause, heretofore issued on February 22,
-
- 1994, is hereby discharged.
-
-
- D-1535 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN W. FRANKUM
-
- It having been reported to the Court that John W.
-
- Frankum, of Kansas City, Missouri, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of
-
- Missouri and this Court by order of April 17, 1995,
-
- having suspended the said John W. Frankum from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said John W. Frankum be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1542 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NICHOLAS T. KITSOS
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Nicholas
-
- T. Kitsos, of Oak Brook, Illinois, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of
-
- Illinois and this Court by order of April 24, 1995,
-
- having suspended the said Nicholas T. Kitsos from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
-
-
-
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Nicholas T. Kitsos be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1546 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALLEN NATHANIEL SMITH, JR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Allen
-
- Nathaniel Smith, Jr., of Indianapolis, Indiana, has
-
- resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme
-
- Court of Indiana and this Court by order of May 15,
-
- 1995, having suspended the said Allen Nathaniel Smith,
-
- Jr., from the practice of law in this Court and directed
-
- that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Allen Nathaniel Smith,
-
- Jr., be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1547 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PATRICK C. SEALY
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Patrick
-
- C. Sealy, of Brooklyn, New York, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, and
-
- this Court by order of May 15, 1995, having suspended
-
- the said Patrick C. Sealy from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him
-
- to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Patrick C. Sealy be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1548 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GREGORY DAVID DICKINSON
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Gregory
-
- David Dickinson, of Burbank, California, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of California and this Court by order of May 15, 1995,
-
- having suspended the said Gregory David Dickinson from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Gregory David Dickinson
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1549 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH M. JAN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Joseph M.
-
- Jan, of Toledo, Ohio, has been disbarred from the
-
- practice of law by the Supreme Court of Michigan and
-
- this Court by order of June 5, 1995, having suspended
-
- the said Joseph M. Jan from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Joseph M. Jan be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1550 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN P. DIUGUID
-
- It having been reported to the Court that John P.
-
- Diuguid, of Bethesda, Maryland, has been disbarred from
-
- the practice of law by the Court of Appeals of Maryland
-
- and this Court by order of June 5, 1995, having
-
- suspended the said John P. Diuguid from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said John P. Diuguid be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1551 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF TIMOTHY WEEKS
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Timothy
-
- Weeks, of Newark, New Jersey, has been disbarred from
-
- the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New Jersey
-
- and this Court by order of June 5, 1995, having
-
- suspended the said Timothy Weeks from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Timothy Weeks be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1554 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LAWRENCE J. OFFNER, JR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Lawrence
-
- J. Offner, Jr., of Union, Missouri, has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Supreme Court of
-
- California and this Court by order of June 5, 1995,
-
- having suspended the said Lawrence J. Offner, Jr., from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Lawrence J. Offner, Jr.,
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1555 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL A. FEIT
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Michael
-
- A. Feit, of Albany, New York, has been suspended from
-
- the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme
-
- Court of New York, Third Judicial Department, and this
-
- Court by order of June 12, 1995, having suspended the
-
- said Michael A. Feit from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Michael A. Feit be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1556 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF J. CHRISTOPHER WARTER
-
- It having been reported to the Court that J.
-
- Christopher Warter, of South Bend, Indiana, has resigned
-
- from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of
-
- Indiana and this Court by order of June 12, 1995, having
-
- suspended the said J. Christopher Warter from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said J. Christopher Warter
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1557 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GEORGE M. HILGENDORF
-
- It having been reported to the Court that George M.
-
- Hilgendorf, of Fort Collins, Colorado, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Colorado and this Court by order of June 12, 1995,
-
- having suspended the said George M. Hilgendorf from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
-
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said George M. Hilgendorf be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1574 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF AHMAD RAHEEM MUHAMMAD
-
- It is ordered that Ahmad Raheem Muhammad, of
-
- Lorman, Mississippi, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1575 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SHELDON ROSENBLUM
-
- It is ordered that Sheldon Rosenblum, of Little
-
- Neck, New York, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1576 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN MICHAEL ROSS
-
- It is ordered that John Michael Ross, of El Cajon,
-
- California, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1577 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM ANDREW ORTMAN
-
- It is ordered that William Andrew Ortman, of
-
- Farmington Hills, Michigan, be suspended from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue,
-
- returnable within forty days, requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice
-
- of law in this Court.
-
- D-1578 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN SNOW THROWER, JR.
-
- It is ordered that John Snow Thrower, Jr., of
-
- Opelika, Alabama, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1579 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID A. KOHNEN
-
- It is ordered that David A. Kohnen, of Cincinnati,
-
- Ohio, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1580 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES J. EWERS
-
- It is ordered that James J. Ewers, of Yanktown,
-
- South Dakota, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
-
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1581 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DESIREE WHITE CRAWFORD
-
- It is ordered that Desiree White Crawford, of
-
- Henderson, North Carolina, be suspended from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue,
-
- returnable within forty days, requiring her to show
-
- cause why she should not be disbarred from the practice
-
- of law in this Court.
-
- D-1582 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRED NEAL KELLNER
-
- It is ordered that Fred Neal Kellner, of Coral
-
- Gables, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1583 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SIMON W. TACHE
-
- It is ordered that Simon W. Tache, of Philadelphia,
-
- Pennsylvania, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1584 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID SHERMAN FELMAN
-
- It is ordered that David Sherman Felman, of Fort
-
- Lauderdale, Florida, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
- D-1485 IN THE MATTER OF THE DISBARMENT OF RICHARD MARK JACOBS
-
- 93-9218 BOYD, JAMES A. V. BROWN, SEC. OF VA
-
- 94-1339 MALTBY, KERRY V. WINSTON, MARY, ET AL.
-
- 94-1388 BERRY, BENNY, ET UX. V. PARRISH, JAMES W., ETC.
-
- 94-1482 CLOUSER, LEROY, ET AL. V. GLICKMAN, SEC. OF AG., ET AL
-
- 94-1521 SPENCER, JESSIE V. MRS. BAIRD'S BAKERIES, ET AL
-
- 94-1532 PARKING ASSN. OF GA, INC. V. ATLANTA, GA
-
- 94-1551 SNEAD, MARYNELL, ET AL. V. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.
-
- 94-1607 NEAL, JACQUELYNE V. BROWN, WILLIAM, ET AL.
-
- 94-1672 SHUMATE, JOSEPH V. NCNB CORPORATION
-
- 94-1680 WILSON, WILMA V. CA WORKERS' COMP. BD., ET AL
-
- 94-1733 TURNER, MERRIE, ETC. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-1759 ELLINGTON, JOY, ET AL. V. LA CTY. SUPERIOR CT., ET AL.
-
- 94-1781 ATTORNEY R. V. MISSISSIPPI BAR
-
- 94-1852 ALLEY, DOYLE V. GE CAPITAL CORP.
-
- 94-7286 PERRYMAN, JOE E. V. PRADO, JUDGE, USDC FOR WD TX
-
- 94-7789 DeBARDELEBEN, JAMES M. V. QUINLAN, J. M., ET AL.
-
- 94-8195 McCULLUM, GLORIA V. JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST.
-
- 94-8273 HUDSPETH, THOMAS L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-8377 CHASE, RICKY V. MISSISSIPPI
-
- 94-8379 MARTIN, LESLIE D. V. LOUISIANA
-
- 94-8502 BARWICK, DARWYNN LEMONTE V. AURORA, CO
-
- 94-8560 CSOKA, LOUIS A. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 94-8576 GAMBLE, KEITH V. TERRY, DAN
-
- 94-8628 IN RE GEORGIA R. BEARDEN
-
- 94-8655 MASON, MICHAEL W. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 94-8666 BROWN, KEITH MICHAEL V. MURRAY, DIR. VA DOC
-
- 94-8675 BLACKSTON, TYRONE NAVARRO V. BECKER, JUDGE, ETC., ET AL.
-
- 94-8705 DOUGLASS, JAMES V. DOUGLAS, ESTATE OF JULIUS
-
- 94-8707 WEEKS, WILLIAM S. V. KAY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
-
- 94-8712 MARTIN, JON V. PETERS, BILL, ET AL.
-
- 94-8722 ROBERTS, RICKEY B. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC
-
- 94-8725 BRANNON, JAMES J. V. LaMAINA, STEPHENIE N.
-
- 94-8734 WATSON, WINSLOW V. MONROE, WARDEN
-
- 94-8775 WALLACE, LARRY D. V. WALLACE, THERESA J.
-
- 94-8778 VOHRA, DEEPAK V. SIKAND ENGINEERING ASSOC.
-
- 94-8780 WILLIAMS, CLAUDE C. V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL
-
- 94-8781 MILLER, ORLANDO V. WHITE, WARDEN
-
- 94-8786 ADAMS, SYLVESTER LEWIS V. MOORE, DIR., SC DOC
-
- 94-8802 SWAIN, DAVID ANTHONY V. VIRGINIA
-
- 94-8843 SIBAY, DALA V. CRESTAR BANK CORP., N.B.
-
- 94-8844 BUSCH, GEORGE W. V. NIX, ROBERT N. C., ET AL.
-
- 94-8846 JACOBS, RICHARD V. SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI
-
- 94-8856 IGNACIO, HERMOGENA V. BROWN, SEC. OF VA
-
- 94-8904 JONES, CEDRIC L. V. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC.
-
- 94-8927 JONES, JOHNNIE, ET AL. V. NORTH WOODLAND HILLS VILLAGE
-
- 94-8941 ALEXANDER, ELIJAH ALFRED V. JOHNSON, JOSEPH, ET AL.
-
- 94-8954 VOHRA, DEEPAK V. CA WORKERS' COMP. APPEALS BD
-
- 94-8958 SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. INTERPOL, ET AL.
-
-
-
- 94-8959 SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INT'L.
-
- 94-8978 WOOD, JOSEPH R. V. ARIZONA
-
- 94-8991 MINCEY, MITCHELL T. V. THOMAS, WARDEN
-
- 94-9017 TOBIAS, RICHARD B. V. TEXAS
-
- 94-9051 HUNDLEY, RAPHAEL D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9063 MORGAN, WALTER D. V. MacDONALD, F. T., ET AL.
-
- 94-9071 GILES, OLIVER C. V. PARKER, WARDEN
-
- 94-9097 ALEXANDER, ELIJAH ALFRED V. WARD, WARDEN
-
- 94-9160 BUTLER, CARNELL V. RICHARDS, TROY, ET AL.
-
- 94-9190 FREEMAN, FRED H. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 94-9206 AZIZ, ZAFAR V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9222 SMITH, MICHAEL HENRY V. DEA, ET AL.
-
- 94-9232 COLEMAN, LEE V. NORRIS, DIR., AR DOC
-
- 94-9235 MARK, GLEN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9267 CARROLL, EDWARD P., ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9273 LOCKETT, CARL D. V. MISSISSIPPI
-
- 94-9274 LOCKETT, CARL D. V. MISSISSIPPI
-
- 94-9348 WALDEMER, MARK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 94-9392 RUFF, JOHN V. BEAVER, ETHEL, ET AL.
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
- 94-1404 ATTAR, AMIR, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed
-
- further herein in forma pauperis is granted. The
-
- petition for rehearing is denied.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 94-7212 CUPIT, MILTON EUGENE V. WHITLEY, WARDEN
-
-
- 94-8440 BOAL, DONALD S. V. DEPT. OF THE ARMY
-
- The motions for leave to file petitions for
-
- rehearing are denied.
-